SpaceX Falcon 9 Block 5 - Crew Dragon DM-1 - Launching March 2, 2019
Screenshot of Tim Dodd’s webcast - DM-1 in the dark night prior to launch - Time critical payloads can be packed in Crew Dragons Cryo freezers prior to Crew Arm retraction - Time to stowaway
Mission Rundown: SpaceX Falcon 9 - Crew Dragon DM-1
Written: January 04, 2021
A small leap of faith for unmanned flight
SpX-DM1 is an uncrewed flight test to the International Space Station as part of NASA's Commercial Crew Program. The launch of SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket and Crew Dragon spacecraft finally happened on March 2, 2019, from historic Launch Complex 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.
This will be the first uncrewed test flight of the Commercial Crew Program and will provide data on the performance of the Falcon-9 rocket, Crew Dragon spacecraft, and ground systems, as well as on-orbit, docking and landing operations. The flight test also will provide valuable data toward NASA certifying SpaceX's crew transportation system for carrying astronauts to and from the space station.
For the first time in history, a commercially-built and operated American crew spacecraft and rocket, which launched from American soil, is on its way to the International Space Station. The SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft lifted off at 02:49:03 EST - 07:49:03 UTC Saturday on a brand new Falcon 9 rocket B1051-1 from Launch Complex 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.
Following a successful DM-1 mission, SpaceX will later conduct a second uncrewed IFA - In-flight Abort Test. This will validate Crew Dragon’s ability to pull crew away to safety in the event of a failure during launch. And we will have manned spaceflight from US soil again since the decommission of the Space Shuttle Programme.
The Dragon Payload
At 2:49:03 a.m. EST on March 2, SpaceX launched Crew Dragon’s first demonstration mission from Launch Complex 39A - LC-39A at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The intent of this test flight without crew on board the spacecraft was to demonstrate SpaceX’s capabilities to safely and reliably fly astronauts to and from the International Space Station as part of NASA’s Commercial Crew Program.
DM-1 Crew Dragon docked with the ISS on March 3 at 01:51 PST, becoming the first American spacecraft to autonomously dock with the orbiting laboratory. The spacecraft undocked from the ISS at 23:32 PST on March 7 and splashed down in the Atlantic Ocean at 05:45 PST on March 8.
PST is Pacific Standard Time properly because of SpaceX headquarter in Hawthorne California. Most global oriented people use UTC Universal Time Coordinated, which used to be GMT Greenwich Meridian Time aka. London Time in olden times. Military forces use the same time, but call it Zulu instead of UTC.
Anyway the launch time is 07:49:03 UTC, because the launch is instantaneous, if you want to catch the ISS on the flyby. Watch this from Scott Manley, and pay attention to the Soyuz rocket launch seen from ISS. This is why you launch on the second with orbital speeds of 7,4 m/s and Earth's rotation also in the equation.
This is the actual Mission Timeline, I also found one on Crew Dragon’s DM-2 page, which I believe is helpful to understand just some of the things that must happen before Lift Off.
After Lift Off, the following launch events happened.
Sorry. No Screenshot from DM-1 available. Just this from January 2020 by Geoff Barrett.
And during the next few days these events happened.
This Crew Dragon rendering is missing its concave heat shield. Crew Dragon is 16 feet tall, the trunk is 12 feet tall. Together they stack 27 feet, and there is an unknown neck ring between the 2nd stage and the bottom of the Trunk. This intermediary Payload Adapter Fitting ring is of unknown height; it seems to be ¼ trunk height, so about 3 feet.
It's been very difficult to find accurate measurements on Falcon 9 and all Dragon types.
Evolution of the capsule
Crew Dragon has undergone many changes since its ostentatious unveiling in 2014. When SpaceX founder and chief engineer, Elon Musk, presented the futuristic spacecraft, it was capable of seating seven astronauts and would land propulsively. However, the complexity of propulsively landing a capsule, and its entailing safety concerns, resulted in certification difficulties, and ultimately, SpaceX pulled the plug on the idea.
Since then, numerous changes have been made. Most notably, due to concerns regarding the g-forces crew might experience, the angle of the seats was changed. As a result of which, the three bottom seats of the original seven-seat configuration were removed, leaving a row of four and more room for supplies below them.
There were plans to use Crew Dragon as a Mars Landing Vehicle, and as a manned laboratory maybe visiting a commercial space station for space tourism or privately funded science missions. I can envision a mission to the Hubble Telescope with a set of spare instruments, batteries and gyroscopes in a Trunk section that also have an airlock, the Crew Dragon can dock with, and a small Canadarm to grab Hubble with.
There were extended trunk sections planned for the previous Cargo Dragon with an extra 10 cubic meters of space in addition to the normal 14 cubic meters of cargo space. Such space could be configured as an airlock from where astronauts could go space walking to, for instance, the Hubble Telescope or derelict commercial satellites in need of repairs.
There is the potential of repeating the Apollo programme with two Falcon 9 launches. One with a Crew Dragon and a service module as the trunk and the other with a lunar lander on a trunk equipped with landing legs, a lunar rover and a lot of supplies for an extended stay on the Moon’s surface. Well. An unmanned Lunar Lander could land a Lunar Telescope or any number of other scientific instruments on the Moon all alone.
Like they say in “The Right Stuff” movie: “No Bucks. No Buck Rogers.”
This will be SpaceX’s last flight in its Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (CCtCap) contract, making it an FAA licensed test flight. The last time this happened was in July 2011 on the final Space Shuttle mission, STS-135.
After this, NASA contracted two private-sector companies – SpaceX and Boeing – to develop next-generation spacecraft to transport astronauts to and from the ISS. You can learn more about the Commercial Crew Program on NASA’s website.
For an in-depth comparison of both SpaceX’s Crew Dragon and Boeing’s CST-100 Starliner CCP spacecraft, check out Everyday Astronaut’s video. Furthermore, if you want to learn more about launch abort systems and why SpaceX and Boeing have ditched abort towers, Everyday Astronaut also has a video covering the topic.
SpaceX and Boeing have two very different strategies towards manned spaceflight and by now SpaceX is way ahead of Boeing, who are traditionally working with taking one step at the time, development, implementation and boardroom decision on how to proceed. It’s like growing a giant petrified tree one ring at the time.
SpaceX is more like a fast growing Bamboo, where a lot of ideas are being developed, implemented and a running boardroom deciding on what works, what doesn't work, and what could work. Propulsive landing doesn't work, but we need an abort system, so let's shift direction to that. Here’s a project, some money and show us what you got later.
This fluent vibrant environment is conducive to creating just about anything.
No comments:
Post a Comment