Thursday, August 24, 2017

SpaceX Falcon 9 - Formosat-5

  SpaceX Falcon 9 Full Thrust - Formosat-5 - Launching August 24, 2017

Screenshot of SpaceX FT Formosat-5 with Tim Dodd hosting

Mission Rundown: SpaceX Falcon 9 FT - Formosat-5

Written: January 23, 2021

Lift Off Time

August 24, 2017 - 18:51 UTC - 11:51 PDT

Mission Name

Formosat-5

Launch Provider

SpaceX

Customer

NSPO - National Space Program Office of Taiwan

Rocket

Falcon 9 Full Thrust serial number B1038-1

Launch Location

Space Launch Complex 4 East - SLC-4E

Vandenberg Air Force Base, California

Payload

Earth Observation Satellite

Payload mass

475 kg ~ 1 045 pounds

Where are the satellite going?

Low Earth Sun Synchronous Polar Orbit

Will they be attempting to recover the first stage?

Yes - A drone ship have been towed out to sea

Where will the first stage land?

Just Read The Instruction - 343 km downrange

Will they be attempting to recover the fairings?

No - Engineers have landed at least two fairings so far

Are these fairings new?

Yes - Two Type 1 boat hull sized fairings - 34 x 17 feet with 10 evenly spaced ventilation ports in a circle

This will be the:

– 40th flight of all Falcon 9 rockets

– 19th flight of Falcon 9 Full Trust “V1.2” booster 

– 17 maiden flight of a Falcon 9 FT rocket

– 5th SpaceX launch from SLC-4E

– 15th booster landing overall

– 12th mission for SpaceX in 2017

Where to watch

Where to read more in depth

SpaceX link

Other link Tim Dodd old video


Launch debriefing

(This is what happend)

-

-

T-00:11:27

Host:

T 00:00:00

T+00:01:10

T+00:02:29

-

T+00:02:40

T+00:02:59

T+00:08:51

T+00:09:18

T+00:10:19

-

T+00:11:19

-

Old intro made by Tim Dodd á la SpaceX

Pre Launch Mission Rundown from 9:01 then Q&A

SpaceX live feed at 35:41

Lauren Lyons missing another dinner today

Liftoff at 47:09

MaxQ at 48:19

MECO at 49:39, stage separation at 49:41

B1038-1 - Velocity 6 821 km/h - Altitude 85,3 km

SES-1 at 49:50 - Velocity 6 512 km/h - Altitude 131 km

Fairing separation at 50:08

Entry burn 56:00 by 3 Merlin 1D+ for 35 seconds

SECO at 56:27 - Velocity 27 300 km/h - Altitude 725 km

Landing burn 57:28 by 1 Merlin 1D+ for 31 seconds

Landing - Velocity 1 094 - 0 km/h - Altitude 3,8 - 0 km

Fastest deployment ever at 58:28 - Good Riddance?

Rap up from Tim Dodd at 59:08 with Q&A



Fast track science satellite going up

SpaceX is launching a Falcon 9 Full Thrust carrying Formosat-5 satellite out of Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. They will be landing the first stage on their droneship "Just Read The Instructions" about 213 miles (343 km's) south of Vandenberg AFB and west of L.A. in the Pacific Ocean.

The 42-minute launch window opens on Thursday, August 24 at 11:51 a.m. PDT, or 18:51 UTC. The satellite will be deployed approximately 11 minutes after launch.

The Payload

Formosat-5 is an Earth observation satellite operated by the National Space Organization (NSPO) of Taiwan. It is NSPO's first indigenously developed remote sensing satellite.

The Remote Sensing Instrument (RSI) is the primary instrument aboard the spacecraft. It is composed of a Telescope and an Electrical Unit (EU). The Telescope consists of Optics, Structure Module (SM) and CMOS typed Focal Plane Assembly (FPA). The mission also incorporates a science payload, the Advanced Ionospheric Probe (AIP), for studies of ionospheric plasma physics.

The satellite is capable of returning images with a resolution of 2 meters (in black and white) or 4 meters in color, but only in weather-permitting conditions.

The satellite was flown from Taiwan to Los Angeles International Airport in the United States on 19 July 2017 via a China Airlines transport aircraft, and arrived at Vandenberg Air Force Base on 26 July. SpaceX launched Formosat-5 in a sun synchronous low earth orbit with an inclination of 98.2892° about 716 - 729 km above earth in a 99,25 minute orbit.

The last flight of B1038-1

This Falcon 9 booster is the last Full Thrust V1.2 rocket - Block 3 booster made in the third production set of 18 boosters in SpaceX main factory in Hawthorne, California. There is a small testset of 7 Block 4 made before the final production of the last Falcon 9 iteration of the fully reusable Block 5 begins.

The flight of this particular booster B1038-1 is as most SpaceX flights a testflight. It had a very light payload 475 kg going in a Sun Synchronous orbit, so it went almost straight up before the stage separation, and then it was the second stage’s job to go sideways from then on. That change in thrust direction was evident from the flight telemetry delivered.

The velocity dropped 300 km/h, and the second stage almost had to launch itself midair before it picked up any lateral velocity.

B1038-1 continued in a high parabolic arc before reaching its maximum peak and it started to fall back to earth with very little fuel left, because with 151 seconds of burn time spent, there is only 9 seconds full thrust left on all 9 Merlin 1D+ engines plus what isn't used because of down throttling during Max Q, going through the sound barrier and before MECO to lower the G force made by the higher thrust to weight ratio.

Now the re- entry burn uses 3 Merlin 1D+ engines in a 1 - 3 - 1 burn sequence each taking 4 - 29 - 2 seconds and they are throttled down, so the propellant consumption is reduced as the booster cuts its velocity by half at least - Well we don't see flight telemetry from the first stage all the time, but the next OTV-5 mission does give us that information.

It should be noted that B1038-1 is a Block 3 Full Trust booster and the following OTV-5 booster B1040-1 is a more powerful Block 4. Burntimes, speeds and altitudes may differ.

The landing burn does give us flight telemetry for just one Merlin 1D+ engine, and I left the figures in the Launch Debriefing above. 31 second burn time during the landing burn added with the 4 - 29 - 2 seconds entry burn time gives a total of 124 seconds burn time in one Merlin 1D+ engine and it’s assumed there is 9 second full thrust left for 9 Merlin 1D+ engines or 81 seconds for just one Merlin 1D+ engine.

The gap of -43 seconds must be covered by throttling down the Merlin 1D+ engines. 81 seconds over 124 seconds gives a ratio of 0,653 which must be close to the throttle down percentage on a Merlin 1D+ engine, which I on WikiPedia have read to be 70%. So that’s Block 3 in burn time numbers without having any idea about propellant weight, propellant consumption ratio, thrust to weight ratio aka. G forces, nor do I know how much propellant there is left in the booster.

As long it burns, there is fuel onboard. Personally I’m guessing 90 seconds burn time left with 3-4 seconds left as spare propellant.

During Apollo 13 “The movie” and probably also in real life Gene Krantz states:

“I don't care what it’s built to do. I care about what it can do.”

Wise words to live by. Now you know a little about what a Falcon 9 Block 3 can do.

Author Tim Dodd link

Coauthor/Text Retriever Johnny Nielsen

link to launch list



Monday, August 14, 2017

SpaceX Falcon 9 - CRS-12

  SpaceX Falcon 9 Block 4 - CRS-12 - Launching August 14, 2017

Screenshot of CRS-12 ready to launch from Pad 39A by SpaceX

Mission Rundown: SpaceX Falcon 9 Block 4 - CRS-12

Written: January 23, 2021

Lift Off Time

August 14, 2017 - 16:31:37 UTC - 12:31:37 EDT

Mission Name

CRS-12

Launch Provider

SpaceX

Customer

NASA

Rocket

Falcon 9 Block 4 serial number B1039-1

Launch Location

Kennedy Launch Complex 39A - LC-39A

Kennedy Space Station, Florida

Payload

Cargo Dragon serial number C113-1

Payload mass

2 910 kg ~ 6 415 lb

Where are the Dragon going?

Low Earth Orbit to the International Space Station

Will they be attempting to recover the first stage?

Yes - The booster have fuel enough to return

Where will the first stage land?

LZ-1 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida

Will they be attempting to recover the fairings?

No. The Dragon capsule have a jettisonable nose cone and solar panel covers on the Trunk

This will be the:

– 39th flight of all Falcon 9 rockets

– 1st flight of Falcon 9 Block 4 rocket

– 1st maiden flight of Falcon 9 Block 4 rocket

– 9th SpaceX launch from LC-39A

– 5th landing on Landing Zone 1

– 14th booster landing overall

– 11th mission for SpaceX in 2017

Where to watch

Where to read more

SpaceX link

Other link Tim Dodd the Everyday Astronaut live from the Causeway on a telephone video feed


Launch debriefing

(This is what happend)

-

-

-

T-00:13:04

T  00:00:00

T+00:01:10

T+00:02:26

-

T+00:02:38

T+00:02:44

-

T+00:04:12

T+00:03:18

T+00:06:08

-

T+00:07:15

-

T+00:09:12

T+00:10:09

T+00:12:39

-

5:50

-

-

Pre Launch Mission Rundown from 0:01 then Q&A

So sorry Tim. Looks like your having fun in the Sun

Sticking to SpaceX Webcast

SpaceX live feed at 0:32 - Tom Praderio hosting

Liftoff at 13:36 - First stage telemetry mostly

MaxQ at 14:46

MECO at 16:02, stage separation at 16:04

Velocity 5 960 km/h Altitude 61,1 km

SES-1 at 16:12 - No telemetry

Boost back burn at 16:20 for 25 seconds ish...

Velocity 5 569 - 3 098 km/h - Altitude 78,3 - 100 km

Coast velocity 1 658 km/h - Max Altitude 118 km

Nose cone barely spottet after separation at 16:54

Entry burn at 19:44 by 3 Merlin 1D# for 15 seconds

Velocity 4 344 - 3 256 km/h Altitude 53,0 - 37,5 km

Landing burn at 20:51 by 1 Merlin 1D# for 32 seconds

Velocity 1 126 - 0 km/h Altitude 4,3 - 0 km

SECO at 22:48 - Velocity 27 135 km/h - Altitude 207 km

Dragon deployment at 23:45

Deployment of solar array at 26:16

Back to Tim Dodd stuck at the Causeway Bridge.

Lift off - Sound at 6:22 - White Max Q track at 7:07

Stage spotted 12:04 - Sonic booms at 13:23

Q&A from 14:12 - Great T-shirt by the way


We got better engines on Block 4

On August 14, 2017, SpaceX launched its twelfth Commercial Resupply Services mission (CRS-12) from Launch Complex 39A - LC-39A at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center, Florida. Liftoff occurred at 12:31 p.m. EDT, or 16:31 UTC and was followed approximately two and a half minutes later by separation of the first and second stages. The first stage of Falcon 9 then successfully landed back at SpaceX’s Landing Zone 1 - LZ-1 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida.

The Dragon Payload

NASA has contracted for the CRS-12 mission from SpaceX and therefore determines the primary payload, date/time of launch, and orbital parameters for the Dragon space capsule C113-1. CRS-12 carried a total of 2 910 kg (6 415 lb) of material into orbit. It included 1 652 kg (3 642 lb) of pressurized cargo with packaging bound for the International Space Station, and 1 258 kg (2 773 lb) of unpressurised cargo composed of the CREAM instrument, to be mounted externally to the ISS.

CRS-12 is the last of the original order of twelve missions awarded to SpaceX under the CRS contract. Originally scheduled for December 2016, the flight was delayed multiple times to August 2017. Launch occurred on 14 August 2017 at 16:31:37 UTC from Kennedy Space Center's Launch Complex 39A aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket.

After Dragon rendezvoused with the ISS on 16 August 2017, the station's Canadarm2 grappled the spacecraft at 10:52 UTC. It berthed to Harmony at 13:07 UTC.

Having been at the ISS for a month, the CRS-12 Dragon capsule was unberthed in the late hours of 16 September 2017 and was released by Canadarm2 on 17 September at 08:40 UTC. After performing separation burns to take it out of the vicinity of the ISS, the Dragon performed a deorbit burn to enable atmospheric reentry. The spacecraft successfully landed in the Pacific Ocean at 14:14 UTC, returning approximately 1 700 kilograms (3 800 lb) of experiments and equipment to Earth.

What is a Falcon 9 Block 4

The Block 4 version is a crossover between Falcon 9 Full Thrust and Falcon 9 Block 5. First change was mounting Block 4 second stages on three regular V1.2 boosters to give an extra kick to deliver 6 tons payloads into Super Synchronous Geostationary Transfer Orbits and expending the boosters for a few hundred kilos of extra payload. These three missions were NROL-76 and Inmarsat-5 F5 in May 2017, and Intelsat 35e in July 2017.

The second stage uses extra chilled cryogenic LOX in an optimized Merlin 1D# vacuum engine with throttle down capacity from 934 kN to 360 kN, so the Thrust to Weight ratio never exceeds 5 times Gravity during orbit insertion. The payloads are usually not built for more than 5 G. Word of warning though. The Merlin engine thrust values are all over the place having found 4-5 different sources on the Web. This is what I know to be true.

The next development was the throttling of the Falcon 9 first stage Merlin 1D# engines, which in the Full Thrust version couldn't be throttled down, but they could be choked by throttling down the fuel flow just before stage separation and during Max Q.

Experiments with the basic Merlin 1D fuel/oxidizer mixture ratio is controlled by the sizing of the propellant supply tubes to each engine, with only a small amount of the total flow trimmed out by a "servo-motor-controlled butterfly valve" to provide fine control of the mixture ratio. Thus the first stage 1D engines could be throttled down to about 70% of its maximum performance.

Further thrust control was being made with pintle injectors in the combustion chamber, and reducing the throttle down to 40%. An increase of thrust and burn time using super chilled cryogenic LOX and chilled RP-1 with an increase in the propellant density was already achieved in the order of 17% on Falcon 9 Full Thrust aka. V1.2.

The experiments with the Merlin 1D showed, that throttling the fuel flow to the engine and specifically the turbopump, increasing the propellant density, throttling the combustion chamber to create a constant pressure and thereby constant thrust had the Merlin Engine go through three versions 1D, 1D+ and 1D# before the Block 5 version.

- 1D sea level thrust 654 kN. Falcon 9 V1.1. Regular propellant. Fuel flow control.

- 1D+ sea level thrust 756 kN. Falcon 9 Full Thrust using super chilled propellant.

- 1D# sea level thrust 783 kN. Falcon 9 Block 4. Constant thrust and chamber control.

The final iteration of Merlin 1D# is a change of the turbo pump construction with a sea level “maximum thrust” of 845 kN, which is used in Falcon 9 Block 5.

I think that the Block iterations 1-5 are just engine block versions and the rest of the changes to the rockets propellant tanks, COPV tanks, grid fins, landing legs, use of fire suppression materials, interstages, payload adaptor fitting rings, fairing versions and dragon capsule versions of cargo and crew are just a general tweaking of Falcon 9.

- 1C sea level thrust 4940 kN. Falcon 9 V1.0. Regular propellant. No fuel flow control.

- 1D sea level thrust 5885 kN. Falcon 9 V1.1. Regular propellant. Fuel flow control.

- 1D+ sea level thrust 6885 kN. Falcon 9 Full Thrust using super chilled propellant.

- 1D# sea level thrust 7047 kN. Falcon 9 Block 4. Constant thrust and chamber control.

- 1D# sea level thrust 7607 kN. Falcon 9 Block 5. New turbopump shaft 7% more thrust.

I found this figure by chance looking for Block 4 on Google photos, which compares a Block 4 with a Block 5 during a similar flight profile with Iridium NEXT payloads. The 7% more powerful Block 5 is able to gain height more easily than Block 4, who by the looks of it is using more propellant with a MECO 2 seconds later. The Block 5 glides longer though using its titanium grid fins, so they reach the same landing burn place.

The only thing wrong in this flight profile comparison is the boost back or boost down burn effect on the two trajectories. They should bend downwards or change direction midair in the Boostback section. There are two other ways of naming these changes in flight directions.

The boost brake burn which is a partly boost back burn but not a boost down burn. There is no need to get down too fast. And the boost turn burn where the rocket changes flight direction midair up to 90 degrees right or left further out to sea or to shore in order to land on a prepared Landing Zone - LZ-5 - in South Carolina, if such a need should arise. Fx. Falcon Heavy with an ISS expansion 20 ton payload.

Flight Profile comparison found on Google photo search

And I haven't even gone into the fray of the nozzle expansion ratio, chamber pressure and regenerative cooling of the rocket engine, which all contribute to increasing the thrust and controllability of a Merlin engine. So I kept it relatively simple.

After diving into this topic, I know, I’m no rocket scientist. My head hurts so much now. Damn Corona self isolation. If you are bored out of your mind, find another hobby, like how they build Pyramids or Stonehenge. I already did that. Not that hard. The ancient people were smarter than you think. Aliens? Bah Humbug.

Just imagine me as Ebenezer Scrooge.

Author Tim Dodd link

Coauthor/Text Retriever Johnny Nielsen

link to launch list


SpaceX - Eutelsat 36D

Screenshot from the launch of Eutelsat 36D. At last we get to see a normal GTO mission in daylight Mission Rundown: SpaceX Falcon 9 - Eutels...